Teaching and Educational Methods
Exploring the Evolution of Cotton Policy: Linking Politics and Policy in Agricultural Economics Education
Julianne Treme(a)
(a)North Carolina State University
JEL Codes: JEL Codes: A22, F13, H23, N52, Q17, Q18
Keywords: WTO Trade Dispute, Agricultural Economics Education, International TradeAbstract
First Published Online: May 21, 2025
Abstract
This article presents a structured approach for instructors in agricultural economics to explore the evolution of U.S. cotton policy, focusing on a podcast to build background knowledge and the use of real-world letters between agricultural leaders to link political decisions to policy outcomes. By examining key legislative changes, international trade disputes, and correspondence between the Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture and the Secretary of Agriculture, students gain insights into the intersection between politics and agricultural policy. Classroom activities, discussions on the World Trade Organization (WTO) case of Brazil vs. United States, and assignments involving real-world letters and composing a follow-up letter in an ongoing correspondence enhance students’ understanding and critical thinking skills. The discussion and activities accommodate various levels of student preparedness. Optional homework and class discussions further reinforce the practical applications and real-world implications of cotton policy for both domestic and international stakeholders. These discussions and learning activities help students critically analyze policy decisions, examine the global implications of U.S. agricultural policies, and develop persuasive arguments for policy advocacy.
References
Congressional Research Service. 2018, August 1. “Seed Cotton as a Farm Program Crop: In Brief,” CRS Report for Congress, R45143. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45143
Glauber, J.W., and P. Westhoff. 2015. “The 2014 Farm Bill and the WTO.” Agricultural Policy Review 2015(2):3–4. https://www.card.iastate.edu/ag_policy_review/article/?a=32
NPR. 2013. “The Cotton Wars.” Planet Money Podcast, Episode 224. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/05/03/180912847/episode-224-the-cotton-wars
Orden, D., and C. Zulauf. 2015. “The Political Economy of the 2014 Farm Bill.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97(5):1298–1311.
Paulson, N., and G. Schnitkey. 2017. “U.S. Oilseeds Production and Policy Comparison.” farmdoc daily. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2017/02/us-oilseeds-production-and-policy-comparison.html
Schnepf, R. 2005. “Background on the U.S.–Brazil WTO Cotton Subsidy Dispute.” CRS Report for Congress, RL32571. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32571
Schnepf, R. 2013. “Brazil’s WTO Case Against the U.S. Cotton Program.” CRS Report for Congress, R43336. Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R43336
Sumner, D.A. 2003. “Implications of the U.S. Farm Bill of 2002 for Agricultural Trade and Trade Negotiations.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47(1):117–140. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.00205
U.S. Congress. 2014. Agricultural Act of 2014. H.R. 2642, 113th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/2642/text
U.S. Congress. 2018. Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. H.R. 1892, 115th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1892/text
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2014. “The Agricultural Act of 2014: Highlights and Implications.”
World Trade Organization. 2004. Panel Report: United States—Subsidies on Upland Cotton (WT/DS267/R). Geneva: WTO Dispute Settlement Body.
World Trade Organization. 2004. “WTO Case DS267: United States—Subsidies on Upland Cotton.” https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm
World Trade Organization. 2014. “Dispute Settlement—The Disputes—DS267.” https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm
Zulauf, C., J. Coppess, N. Paulson, and G. Schnitkey. 2023. “Farm Bill 2023: Is There Bad Medicine in Base Acres and Reference Prices?” farmdoc daily. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2023/08/farm-bill-2023-is-there-bad-medicine-in-base-acres-and-reference-prices.html
Articles in this issue
Buyer Market Power in the U.S. Broiler Chicken Industry
Yuliya V. Bolotova
The Implementation of Non-explicit Grading
Timothy Meyer, Lia Nogueira, Fabio Mattos, Simanti Banerjee, and Kathleen Brooks
Exploring the Evolution of Cotton Policy: Linking Politics and Policy in Agricultural Economics Education
Julianne Treme
Commentary on Extension Programming: An Online Platform for Area-Wide Management of Western X-Disease Extension Program
Khashi Ghorbani, Shady S. Atallah and R. Karina Gallardo
Cultivating Farmers, Connections, and Careers: The Utah Urban and Small Farms Conference Experience
Katie Wagner, Kynda Curtis, Ruby Ward, Melanie Stock, and Sheriden Hansen