This article presents a structured approach for instructors in agricultural economics to explore the evolution of U.S. cotton policy, focusing on a podcast to build background knowledge and the use of real-world letters between agricultural leaders to link political decisions to policy outcomes. By examining key legislative changes, international trade disputes, and correspondence between the Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture and the Secretary of Agriculture, students gain insights into the intersection between politics and agricultural policy. Classroom activities, discussions on the World Trade Organization (WTO) case of Brazil vs. United States, and assignments involving real-world letters and composing a follow-up letter in an ongoing correspondence enhance students’ understanding and critical thinking skills. The discussion and activities accommodate various levels of student preparedness. Optional homework and class discussions further reinforce the practical applications and real-world implications of cotton policy for both domestic and international stakeholders. These discussions and learning activities help students critically analyze policy decisions, examine the global implications of U.S. agricultural policies, and develop persuasive arguments for policy advocacy.

Congressional Research Service. 2018, August 1. “Seed Cotton as a Farm Program Crop: In Brief,” CRS Report for Congress, R45143. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45143

Glauber, J.W., and P. Westhoff. 2015. “The 2014 Farm Bill and the WTO.” Agricultural Policy Review 2015(2):3–4. https://www.card.iastate.edu/ag_policy_review/article/?a=32

NPR. 2013. “The Cotton Wars.” Planet Money Podcast, Episode 224. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/05/03/180912847/episode-224-the-cotton-wars

Orden, D., and C. Zulauf. 2015. “The Political Economy of the 2014 Farm Bill.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97(5):1298–1311.

Paulson, N., and G. Schnitkey. 2017. “U.S. Oilseeds Production and Policy Comparison.” farmdoc daily. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2017/02/us-oilseeds-production-and-policy-comparison.html

Schnepf, R. 2005. “Background on the U.S.–Brazil WTO Cotton Subsidy Dispute.” CRS Report for Congress, RL32571. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32571

Schnepf, R. 2013. “Brazil’s WTO Case Against the U.S. Cotton Program.” CRS Report for Congress, R43336. Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R43336

Sumner, D.A. 2003. “Implications of the U.S. Farm Bill of 2002 for Agricultural Trade and Trade Negotiations.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47(1):117–140. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.00205

U.S. Congress. 2014. Agricultural Act of 2014. H.R. 2642, 113th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/2642/text

U.S. Congress. 2018. Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. H.R. 1892, 115th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1892/text

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2014. “The Agricultural Act of 2014: Highlights and Implications.”

World Trade Organization. 2004. Panel Report: United States—Subsidies on Upland Cotton (WT/DS267/R). Geneva: WTO Dispute Settlement Body.

World Trade Organization. 2004. “WTO Case DS267: United States—Subsidies on Upland Cotton.” https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm

World Trade Organization. 2014. “Dispute Settlement—The Disputes—DS267.” https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm

‌Zulauf, C., J. Coppess, N. Paulson, and G. Schnitkey. 2023. “Farm Bill 2023: Is There Bad Medicine in Base Acres and Reference    Prices?” farmdoc daily. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2023/08/farm-bill-2023-is-there-bad-medicine-in-base-acres-and-reference-prices.html