Unannounced Quizzes and Exam Performance: Evidence of a Continuous Preparation Effect in Introductory Microeconomics
Moon Joon Kim(a)
(a)George Mason University Korea
JEL Codes: JEL Codes: A22, I23, D01
Keywords: best-of-N grading, preparation effect, satisficing, strategic slacking, unannounced quizzes
First Published Online: February 11, 2026
Abstract
This study investigates whether unannounced quizzes can improve student learning outcomes in introductory microeconomics courses. Using data from 257 students and controlling for section-by-semester fixed effects, we find that unannounced quizzes significantly improve final exam performance. Moreover, quiz performance predicts exam success even when quiz scores do not count toward the final grade. This suggests that the results are driven by a continuous preparation effect—students maintaining regular study habits in anticipation of surprise assessments—rather than by immediate grade incentives. However, under a “best-of-N” quiz grading policy, we identify a trade-off. While this policy provides a safety net for lower-performing students (consistent with mastery learning principles), it inadvertently encourages strategic slacking among high achievers. Once these students have secured the maximum possible quiz credit, they rationally reduce their effort. These findings underscore the importance of designing assessment structures that sustain motivation across the full spectrum of student ability levels.
References
Andrews, D.W.K. 2005. “Cross-Section Regression with Common Shocks.” Econometrica 73(5):1551–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00629.x
Ariely, D., and K. Wertenbroch. 2002. “Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment.” Psychological Science 13(3):219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00441
Azorlosa, J. L. 2011. “The Effect of Announced Quizzes on Exam Performance: II.” Journal of Instructional Psychology 38(1):3–7.
Babyak, M.A. 2004. “What You See May Not Be What You Get: A Brief, Nontechnical Introduction to Overfitting in Regression-Type Models.” Psychosomatic Medicine 66(3):411–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., C.-L.C. Kulik, and J.A. Kulik. 1991. “Effects of Frequent Classroom Testing.” Journal of Educational Research 85(2):89–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818
Becker, G.S. 1965. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” Economic Journal 75(299):493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949
Bjork, E.L., and R.A. Bjork. 2011. “Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way: Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance Learning.” In M.A. Gernsbacher, R.W. Pew, L.M. Hough, and J.R. Pomerantz, eds. Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society. Worth Publishers, 56–64.
Bjork, R.A. 1994. “Memory and Metamemory Considerations in the Training of Human Beings.” In J. Metcalfe and A.P. Shimamura, Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. MIT Press, 185–205.
Bjork, R.A., J. Dunlosky, and N. Kornell. 2013. “Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions.” Annual Review of Psychology 64:417–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5(1):7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Blasco-Arcas, L., I. Buil, B. Hernández-Ortega, and F.J. Sese. 2013. “Using Clickers in Class. The Role of Interactivity, Active Collaborative Learning and Engagement in Learning Performance.” Computers & Education 62:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
Bloom, B.S. 1968. “Learning for Mastery.” Evaluation Comment 1(2):1–12.
Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22(2):151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
Button, K.S., J.P.A. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, B.A. Nosek, J. Flint, E.S.J. Robinson, and M.R. Munafò. 2013. “Power Failure: Why Small Sample Size Undermines the Reliability of Neuroscience.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14(5):365–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
Cameron, A.C., and D.L. Miller. 2015. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources 50(2):317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
Carpenter, S.K., N.J. Cepeda, H. Pashler, E. Vul, and J.T. Wixted. 2008. “The Effects of Tests on Learning and Forgetting.” Memory & Cognition 36(2):438–448. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.438
Cassady, J.C., and R.E. Johnson. 2002. “Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 27(2):270–295. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Cepeda, N.J., H. Pashler, E. Vul, J.T. Wixted, and D. Rohrer. 2006. “Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: A Review and Quantitative Synthesis.” Psychological Bulletin 132(3):354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Chatterjee, S., and A.S. Hadi. 2012. Regression Analysis by Example, 5th ed. Wiley.
Eccles, J.S., and A. Wigfield. 2002. “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53:109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Graham, R.B. 1999. “Unannounced Quizzes Promotes Academic Performance.” Psychological Reports 84(1):267–273. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.84.1.267
Greene, W.H. 2012. Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson Education.
Guskey, T.R. 2007. “Closing Achievement Gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s ‘Learning for Mastery’.” Journal of Advanced Academics 19(1):8–31. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-704
Halvorsen, R., and R. Palmquist. 1980. “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations.” American Economic Review 70(3):474–475.
Harrell, F.E. 2015. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7
Imbens, G.W., and J.M. Wooldridge. 2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(1):5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5
Kamuche, F.U. 2007. “The Effects Of Unannounced Quizzes On Student Performance: Further Evidence.” College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal 3(2):21–26. https://doi.org/10.19030/ctms.v3i2.5277
Karpicke, J.D., A.C. Butler, and H.L. Roediger. 2009. “Metacognitive Strategies in Student Learning: Do Students Practice Retrieval When They Study on Their Own?” Memory 17(4):471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
Karpicke, J.D., and H.L. Roediger. 2008. “The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning.” Science 319(5865):966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408
Latif, E., and S. Miles. 2020. “The Impact of Assignments and Quizzes on Exam Grades: A Difference-in-Difference Approach.” Journal of Statistics Education 28(3):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1807366
Leeming, F.C. 2002. “The Exam-A-Day Procedure Improves Performance in Psychology Classes.” Teaching of Psychology 29(3):210–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2903_06
Mawhinney, V.T., D.E. Bostow, D.R. Laws, G.J. Blumenfeld, and B.L. Hopkins. 1971. “A Comparison of Students Studying-Behavior Produced by Daily, Weekly, and Three-Week Testing Schedules.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 4(4):257–264. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1971.4-257
McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In P. Zarembka, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, pp. 105–142.
Moulton, B.R. 1990. “An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72(2):334–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109724
Putwain, D.W. 2008. “Deconstructing Test Anxiety.” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 13(2):141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750802027631
Putwain, D.W., and W. Symes. 2011. “Teachers’ Use of Fear Appeals in the Mathematics Classroom: Worrying or Motivating Students?” British Journal of Educational Psychology 81(3):456–474. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002005
Roediger, H.L., and J.D. Karpicke. 2006. “Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention.” Psychological Science 17(3):249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
Romer, D. 1993. “Do Students Go to Class? Should They?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(3):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.167
Segool, N.K., J.S. Carlson, A.N. Goforth, and N. von der Embse. 2013. “Heightened Test Anxiety among Young Children: Elementary School Students’ Anxious Responses to High-Stakes Testing.” Psychology in the Schools 50(5):489–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21689
Simon, H.A. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review 63(2):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769
Stanca, L. 2006. “The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics.” Journal of Economic Education 37(3):251–266. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.3.251-266
Stowell, J.R. 2015. “Online Open-Book Testing in Face-to-Face Classes.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000013
Walstad, W.B. 2001. “Improving Assessment in University Economics.” Journal of Economic Education 32(3):281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2001.10844715
Walstad, W.B., and W.E. Becker. 1994. “Achievement and Attitude Measurement in Economics.” In P. Saunders and W.B. Walstad, eds. The Principles of Economics Course: A Handbook for Instructors. McGraw-Hill, pp. 163–183.
Wiliam, D. 2011. “What Is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. MIT Press.
———. 2015. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 6th ed. South-Western Cengage Learning.
Yerkes, R.M., and J.D. Dodson. 1908. “The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation.” Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 18(5):459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503
Zeidner, M. 1998. Test Anxiety: The State of the Art. Plenum Press.
Zimmerman, B.J. 2002. “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41(2):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Articles in this issue
Economic Implications of a Major US Infant Formula Recall: Understanding the Industry, Consumer Behavior, and Policy Response
Jeta Rudi-Polloshka, Sevval Buse Sariman, Mina Hejazi, and Amanda A. Lathrop
Unannounced Quizzes and Exam Performance: Evidence of a Continuous Preparation Effect in Introductory Microeconomics
Moon Joon Kim
Extending the Classroom: An Intercollegiate Strategic Management Simulation for Agribusiness Courses
Andrea Leschewski and R. Brent Ross
Student Reflections on Problem-Based Learning: The Use of Open Research Calls in Problem Design
Edel Kelly and Tomás Russell
Juggling Students and Industry Needs: Redesigning an Academic Agribusiness Program
Serhat Asci, Todd Lone, and Pei Xu
Re-engaging Traditional Students and Attracting New Talent to Agricultural and Applied Economics Curricula and Agribusiness Careers
English Ratliff, Sierra Howry, Kenrett Jefferson Moore, Jerrod Penn, Mohammed Ibrahim, et.al
Designing a Farm and Ranch Management Plan: A Teaching Template
Nicole Karwowski and Beth Shirley
Seven Editions of Pedagogical Innovation: Insights for Developing an Agribusiness Management Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century
Jay Akridge, Freddie L. Barnard, Brady E. Brewer, W. David Downey, John C. Foltz, Trey Malone


